The CJP said that he tried to include the same judges in the bench
ISLAMABAD – Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Wednesday rejected the PTI's objection regarding the formation of the bench to hear review petition of the Article 63-A revision case.
Barrister Ali submitted that he filed the review application late due to which it was not fixed for hearing. Chief Justice Isa asked him when the application was file; you must have filed it in the morning? The Chief Justice said that if he had to consult the PTI founder, he would have told him yesterday, the court would have issued an order. In the past, the court had called the PTI founder on video link, and had arranged a meeting with the lawyers.
The barrister said that he was not arguing about the legality of the ordinance. He argued that the bench was not constituted in accordance with this law. The law says that a three-member committee will constitute a bench. As per the law, the benches should be formed by majority vote. There is no provision in the law for two members of the committee to form a bench.
The chief justice remarked that can we abolish a law by calling a full court meeting? “In my view, what my colleague wrote was not within the scope of the Constitution and the law. If I stop sitting in the meeting, will the Supreme Court will be closed.”
پاکستان تازہ ترین خبریں, پاکستان عنوانات
Similar News:آپ اس سے ملتی جلتی خبریں بھی پڑھ سکتے ہیں جو ہم نے دوسرے خبروں کے ذرائع سے جمع کی ہیں۔
Objection raised to new SC bench hearing Article 63-A verdict review pleaAn objection was raised against the SC bench hearing Article 63-A review, challenging the legality of the court's proceedings in t...
مزید پڑھ »
SC constitutes new larger bench to hear Article 63-A review pleaSC on Tuesday formed a new larger bench to hear the review petition concerning the interpretation of Article 63-A of Pakistan’s Constitution
مزید پڑھ »
SC constitutes larger bench to hear review plea on Article 63-A interpretationLatest News, Breaking News, Pakistan News, News Headlines, Election Pakiatan
مزید پڑھ »
SC larger bench headed by CJP to hear review petition on Article 63A interpretationA SC bench hears Article 63A review petition headed by the Chief Justice, discussing the interpretation of the constitutional prov...
مزید پڑھ »
Another letter to SC registrar: Justice Akhtar questions legality of bench of Article 63-A review plea in his absenceJustice Munib Akhtar wrote another letter to registrar, raising concerns about legitimacy of bench abouit Article 63-A rplea in his absence
مزید پڑھ »
Justice Munib recuses himself from SC bench hearing appeals in Article 63-A caseJustice Munib recuses from Article 63-A case, stepping down from the Supreme Court bench in a high-profile constitutional case tha...
مزید پڑھ »