The CJP warned that he was “crossing the line. We can issue you a contempt of court notice
ISLAMABAD – The Supreme Court Thursday accepted the review petitions against the decision on Article 63-A , annulling the ruling that dissident members' votes should not be counted.
As the proceedings began, Barrister Ali quoted the PTI founder as saying the bench is not legal so there is no point in proceeding. Barrister Ali retorted that the government was bringing about constitutional amendment and judicial package for you. "If you decide this case, it will be tantamount to grant permission for horse trading," he said.
The chief justice reminded him what Hasil Bizenjo said about a Senate election. “Cameras were installed in an institution like the Senate during the election, Mr Ali Zafar, why are you afraid of a decision.” Ali Zafar pleaded that the president had asked for an opinion regarding 63-A. A review cannot be filed against opinion. Only the President of Pakistan could have referred if further clarification was required.
The CJP stated that every dictator says he will eliminate all corrupt members and assemblies. But everybody joins the military regime and then start talking of democracy. The chief justice remarked that democracy continued to be derailed because this court kept validating wrongful actions. Justice Afghan said that yesterday the court was dared to give a decision against the PTI. Is this the way to get a decision by threatening the court?
Winding his arguments, Barrister Ali said he had argued the case after 11:30am as a judicial assistant, and not as a counsel for the PTI. People's Party lawyer Farooq H. Naik came to the rostrum and argued that floor crossing is allowed in Britain. It is considered as personal freedom.
پاکستان تازہ ترین خبریں, پاکستان عنوانات
Similar News:آپ اس سے ملتی جلتی خبریں بھی پڑھ سکتے ہیں جو ہم نے دوسرے خبروں کے ذرائع سے جمع کی ہیں۔
SC constitutes new larger bench to hear Article 63-A review pleaSC on Tuesday formed a new larger bench to hear the review petition concerning the interpretation of Article 63-A of Pakistan’s Constitution
مزید پڑھ »
Objection raised to new SC bench hearing Article 63-A verdict review pleaAn objection was raised against the SC bench hearing Article 63-A review, challenging the legality of the court's proceedings in t...
مزید پڑھ »
SC constitutes larger bench to hear review plea on Article 63-A interpretationLatest News, Breaking News, Pakistan News, News Headlines, Election Pakiatan
مزید پڑھ »
Supreme Court overturns Article 63-A interpretation verdictPTI lawyer Ali Zafar boycotts the SC hearing on Article 63-A interpretation citing constitutional concerns. Chief Justice Isa warn...
مزید پڑھ »
Justice Munib recuses himself from SC bench hearing appeals in Article 63-A caseJustice Munib recuses from Article 63-A case, stepping down from the Supreme Court bench in a high-profile constitutional case tha...
مزید پڑھ »
Review Hearing Of 63-A : A Group Wants Institutions To Run As Per Their Wishes: Justice MandokhelThe 5 member bench of the Supreme Court hearing review petition on article 63-a has rejected the objections raised by PTI founder's Lawyer Ali Zafar against the bench.
مزید پڑھ »